Long-term follow-up of the randomized trial of mesorectal excision with or without lateral lymph node dissection in rectal cancer (JCOG0212).

BACKGROUND: Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) 0212 (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00190541) was a non-inferiority phase III trial of patients with clinical stage II-III rectal cancer without lateral pelvic lymph node enlargement. The trial compared mesorectal excision (ME) with ME and lateral lymph node dissection (LLND), with a primary endpoint of recurrence-free survival (RFS). The planned primary analysis at 5 years failed to confirm the non-inferiority of ME alone compared with ME and LLND. The present study aimed to compare ME alone and ME with LLND using long-term follow-up data from JCOG0212. METHODS: Patients with clinical stage II-III rectal cancer below the peritoneal reflection and no lateral pelvic lymph node enlargement were included in this study. After surgeons confirmed R0 resection by ME, patients were randomized to receive ME alone or ME with LLND. The primary endpoint was RFS. RESULTS: A total of 701 patients from 33 institutions were assigned to ME with LLND (351) or ME alone (350) between June 2003 and August 2010. The 7-year RFS rate was 71.1 per cent for ME with LLND and 70·7 per cent for ME alone (hazard ratio (HR) 1·09, 95 per cent c.i. 0·84 to 1·42; non-inferiority P = 0·064). Subgroup analysis showed improved RFS among patients with clinical stage III disease who underwent ME with LLND compared with ME alone (HR 1·49, 1·02 to 2·17). CONCLUSION: Long-term follow-up data did not support the non-inferiority of ME alone compared with ME and LLND. ME with LLND is recommended for patients with clinical stage III disease, whereas LLND could be omitted in those with clinical stage II tumours.

ANTECEDENTES: El JCOG0212 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00190541) fue un ensayo fase III de no inferioridad en pacientes con cáncer de recto en estadio clínico II/III sin ganglios linfáticos aumentados de tamaño en la pared pélvica lateral. El ensayo comparó la escisión del mesorrecto (mesorectal excision, ME) con la ME con disección de los ganglios linfáticos laterales (lateral lymph node dissection, LLND), siendo el criterio de valoración principal la supervivencia libre de recidiva (recurrence free survival, RFS). El análisis primario planificado a los 5 años de seguimiento no pudo confirmar la no inferioridad de la ME frente a la ME con LLND. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo comparar la ME como procedimiento único y la ME con LLND utilizando datos de seguimiento a largo plazo del ensayo JCOG0212. MÉTODOS: En este estudio se incluyeron pacientes con cáncer de recto en estadio clínico II/III por debajo de la reflexión peritoneal sin ganglios linfáticos aumentados de tamaño en la pared pélvica lateral. Después de que los cirujanos confirmaran la resección R0 mediante la ME, los pacientes fueron asignados al azar al brazo de ME sola o al brazo de ME con LLND. El criterio de valoración principal fue la supervivencia libre de recidiva (RFS). RESULTADOS: Un total de 701 pacientes de 33 instituciones fueron asignados al azar para ser tratados mediante una ME con LLND (n = 351) o EM sola (n = 350) entre junio de 2003 y agosto de 2010. Las tasas de RFS a 7 años fueron del 71,1% para ME con LLND y 70,7 % para ME sola (cociente de riesgos instantáneos, hazard ratio, HR: 1,09 (i.c. del 95% 0,84-1,42), no inferioridad P = 0,064)). El análisis de subgrupos mostró una mejor RFS entre los pacientes en estadio clínico III que se sometieron a ME con LLND en comparación con ME sola (HR: 1,49 (i.c. del 95%: 1,02-2,17)). CONCLUSIÓN: Los datos de seguimiento a largo plazo no justificaron la no inferioridad de la ME en comparación con la ME con LLND. Se recomienda la ME con LLND para pacientes en estadio clínico III, mientras que LLND podría omitirse para pacientes en estadio clínico II.

Male sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery: Results of a randomized trial comparing mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for patients with lower rectal cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0212.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a randomized controlled trial (JCOG0212) to determine whether the outcome of mesorectal excision (ME) alone for rectal cancer is not inferior to that of ME with lateral lymph node dissection (LLND). The present study focused on male sexual dysfunction after surgery. METHODOLOGY: Eligibility criteria included clinical stage II/III rectal cancer, the lower margin of the lesion below the peritoneal reflection, the absence of lateral pelvic lymph node enlargement, and no preoperative radiotherapy. After confirmation of R0 resection by ME, patients were intraoperatively randomized. Questionnaires using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) about the sexual function of men were collected before and 1 year after surgery. Sexual dysfunction incidence was defined as the ratio of patients showing sexual dysfunction after surgery relative to the number who had no erectile dysfunction before surgery. RESULTS: Among 701 patients enrolled between June 2003 and August 2010, 472 males were included. Among them, 343 (73%) completed preoperative and postoperative questionnaires. According to the study protocol, the incidences of sexual dysfunction in patients who underwent ME alone and ME with LLND were 68% (17/25; 95%CI, 47-85%) and 79% (23/29; 95%CI, 60-92%), respectively (p = 0.37). Incidences of sexual dysfunction in patients with no or only mild erectile dysfunction before surgery who underwent ME alone and ME with LLND were 59% (48/81) and 71% (67/95), respectively (p = 0.15). Multivariate analysis identified age as the only risk factor for sexual dysfunction after surgery (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: LLND may not increase sexual dysfunction incidence after rectal cancer surgery. This incidence is associated with increased age. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00190541 and University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, number C000000034.

[A case of bronchiolo-alveolar carcinoma with high production of carbohydrate antigen (CA19-9)].

A 75-year-old female had loss of appetite, left hypochondrial and back pain. An X-ray and a computed tomogram of both lungs showed multiple small granular shadows. By Tc-labelled bone scintigram, multiple uptakes were found. Since high serum CA19-9 was obtained, pancreatic or bile duct cancer with multiple lung and bone metastasis was suspected. The autopsy revealed, small nodules in both lungs were well-differentiated adenocarcinoma, bronchiolo-alveolar type, and immunohistologically, tumor cells were stained positively for CA19-9. Since CA19-9 exists in normal bronchial glands and bronchiole, high level of serum CA19-9 in our patient may be derived from the neoplastic bronchiolar epithelium.

Metachronous liver metastasis of colorectal cancer: timing of occurrence and efficacy of adjuvant portal chemotherapy.

We estimated the time of occurrence of metachronous liver metastasis in colorectal cancer patients from tumor diameter and doubling time. Micro-metastasis was present prior to operation in most patients and a few metastatic cases could have been initiated by the surgical procedure. Portal chemotherapy is more effective against liver metastasis than intravenous infusion because a higher drug concentration in the liver can be obtained. This efficacy of portal chemotherapy on survival was also observed in a rat model. Thus perioperative adjuvant treatment should be undertaken for metastasis which already existed before the operation and adjuvant chemotherapy via portal vein is the treatment of choice. The no touch isolation technique is also needed to avoid spreading of tumor cells during surgery.

Comparative antitumor activity of 5-fluorouracil and its prodrugs in combination with hyperthermia in vitro.

We investigated the antitumor activities of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (5'-DFUR), 1-hexylcarbamoyl-5-fluorouracil (HCFU) and 1-(tetrahydro-2-furanyl)-5-fluorouracil (FT-207) in combination with hyperthermia in vitro. The antitumor effect of 5-FU (10(-4) M) was slightly enhanced by combination with hyperthermia (42 degrees C) for 2h, and the effect was determined to be additive. Synergistic enhancement of antitumor activity was obtained by the concurrent use of hyperthermia (42 degrees C, 2h) and 5'-DFUR (10(-4) M) or HCFU (10(-5) M). However, the antitumor effect of FT-207 (10(-4) M) in combination with hyperthermia was comparable that of hyperthermia alone. The synergistic enhancement of antitumor activity was not obtained for all drugs when the cells were preheated at 42 degrees C for 2h. On the other hand, when cells were pretreated with drugs before heat exposure, weak interactions were obtained after 5-FU and 5'-DFUR treatment, and a synergistic interaction was obtained after HCFU treatment. It is speculated that the metabolites of 5'-DFUR and HCFU enhance the cytotoxicity of 5-FU, or might change the threshold concentration for a cytotoxic effect of 5-FU in cancer cells.